A competência legislativa concorrente em matéria ambiental: Ambiguidades interpretativas da jurisprudência do STF e o papel da legislação federal como standard protetivo mínimo
The article deals with the difficulties of interpreting and applying the concurrent legislative competences established in the Federal Constitution of 1988, particularly in matters of environmental law. There has been a hypertrophy of federal regulations to the detriment of the supplementary space o...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2025 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
| Repositório: | Publicum |
| Idioma: | português |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/87971 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/publicum/article/view/87971 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | environmental law concurrent competence federalism constitutional jurisdiction direito ambiental competência concorrente federalismo jurisdição constitucional |
| Resumo: | The article deals with the difficulties of interpreting and applying the concurrent legislative competences established in the Federal Constitution of 1988, particularly in matters of environmental law. There has been a hypertrophy of federal regulations to the detriment of the supplementary space of the state legislators. At the same time, the semantic ambiguities and polysemy of the constitutional text make it difficult to draw a precise line between federal normativity and local supplementation. An interpretative ambiguity can be noted in the jurisprudence of the Federal Supreme Court, sometimes leaning in favor of federal competence, sometimes ensuring the space of the state legislator. However, federal legislation is often seen as a minimum protective standard from which the local legislator is not allowed to retreat. In view of the centrality of the environmental agenda, it would be desirable to build more solid jurisprudential parameters, encouraging the advancement of an effective ecological cooperative federalism. |
|---|