Developed Force of Papillary Muscle What Index Correctly Indicates Contractile Capacity?

We hypothesized that similar samples of the same normal heart should report similar contractile index values. We analyzed anterior (AP) and posterior (PP) papillary muscles (PM) of the same heart (n = 46), whose representation of force fulfills this premise calculating force (F: mN), tension (T: mN/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Bocalini, Danilo Sales [UNIFESP], Tucci, Paulo José Ferreira [UNIFESP]
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2009
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/44017
Acceso en línea:http://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.50.643
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/44017
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Papillary muscles
Contractile indexes
Myocardial mechanics
Force
Tension
Tension per milligram of myocardium
Descripción
Sumario:We hypothesized that similar samples of the same normal heart should report similar contractile index values. We analyzed anterior (AP) and posterior (PP) papillary muscles (PM) of the same heart (n = 46), whose representation of force fulfills this premise calculating force (F: mN), tension (T: mN/mm(2)), and tension per milligram of myocardium (delta: mN/mm(2)/mg). In all analyses, F and +dF/dt as well as T and dT/dt values were higher in heavier PM. These differences disappeared for delta and delta 8/dt. There was a significant and positive correlation for F and T as well as its derivative with myocardial mass. Myocardial depression (verapamil) of PP, in comparison to AP, was not recognized by F or T, but was identified when reported as delta. We Conclude that the normalization of tension for papillary Muscle mass is the most appropriate form for reporting intrinsic contractile capacity in PM since F and T depend on the myocardial mass participating in contraction. (Int Heart J 2009; 50; 643-652)